Tuesday, June 8, 2010

Sharks Bite on Sundays @ Full Moon & You Wear Black&White Contrast Surf/Swim Gear


Most Shark Attacks, Sunday, New Moon

Published on June 07, 2010


GAINESVILLE, FLORIDA, FL


A surfer is most at risk of a shark attack if it is Sunday during a new moon, is in shallow water and is wearing black and white, U.S. researchers found.

University of Florida researchers analyzed statistics from 231 shark attacks that occurred in Florida's Volusia County -- also known as the "Shark Attack Capital of the World" -- from 1956 to 2008.

George Burgess, director of the International Shark Attack File at the University of Florida, says the researchers also spent one year observing people between Daytona Beach and New Smyrna Beach.

"It's basically an analysis of why, where and when in an area that traditionally has had more shark-human interactions than any other stretch of coastline in the world," Burgess says in a statement. "One of our students, Brittany Garner, essentially camped out there, counted the number of heads on the beach and took photographs."

The 47-mile-long section of beach had as much as 21 percent of all global shark attacks from 1999 to 2008.

The researchers say the sharks don't prefer weekends -- more shark attacks occurred on Sunday because there are more people in the water. The phase of the moon is linked to the tides and the black-and-white bathing suits may attract sharks because sharks see sharp contrasts best, the researcher says."

Johan@whiterockreporter.com




From Source::
NewsDesk - iWireNews ™
news@iwirenews.com

Captain Simon at sea;;;Stockholm, Sweden @ 23. June 2010 Inquiries International Assignments and offer to 'email marked 'SamFan' johanpublisher@gmail.com

Farmers' Market-White Rock; Semiahmoo Indian Band & First Nation Enterta...

SURFSIDE FLOORING ON RUSSEL AVENUE AND JOHNSTON RD. WHITE ROCK IS THE SPONSOR OF THIS CANDID VIDEO

Sunday, June 6, 2010

Citizens for Safe Technologies..Una St. Clair-Moniz sent me this../Ciao/Johan

Health Risks From Wireless Technologies
by author Jeffry Fawcett, PhD


Suppose several hundred marine biologists were to study your
swimming pool. A reasonable percentage of them report that you’ve got sharks in
your pool. Would you dive in? Would you let your kids swim in the pool?
According to European reports, cellphone radiation may be the shark in the
water, and it is endangering our health.


Radio frequency radiation–the kind of radiation we’re exposed to
from sources such as cellphones, cellphone antennas, cordless phones, wireless
routers, and other wireless technologies such as the iPhone–may have biological
and health effects. Of the hundreds of studies conducted, 47 percent found
increased cancer risks, 69 percent found disruptions to cell function, 77
percent found disruptions to electrical signalling in the body, and 83 percent
found neurological, physiological, and behavioural effects.


No Proof of a Problem


This evidence has not convinced the major health agencies in
North America to take action. In fact, the North American governments continue
to reassure consumers: Health Canada says, “There is currently no convincing
evidence, from animal or human studies, that the energy from cellphones is
enough to cause serious health effects.”


Yet a survey by the European Union Commission found that most
Europeans believe cellphones and cellphone antennas damage health. Most
Europeans also reported feeling properly informed on these issues by health
agencies and the businesses that provide wireless technologies.


At about the same time, two events reinforced these concerns. As
with the European Commission survey, these events were covered extensively by
the European media but not at all in the North American media.


WiFi in British Schools


The first event was a BBC television news program broadcast in
May 2007 that reported on schools with wireless networks. The program claimed
that children in those schools are exposed to radiation up to three times the
intensity generated by a cellphone antenna. The program prompted Sir William
Stewart, head of the UK Health Protection Agency, along with the UK’s
Professional Association of Teachers, to call for an immediate moratorium. Some
schools dropped plans to install wireless networks. Others initiated plans to
remove wireless networks.


Health risks exposed


The second event to bring attention to wireless health risks was
the release of the BioInitiative Report in August 2007. An international group
of leading scientists formed the BioInitiative Working Group to summarize what
is known about wireless health risks and to examine the inadequacies of current
standards in light of that evidence.


The BioInitiative Working Group found significant evidence of
harm: cancer (including childhood leukemia), nerve and brain damage, DNA damage,
increased stress response, and decreased immune response. All of these effects
were found at levels of radiation well below the current standards.


Almost immediately upon the report’s release, the European
Environment Agency called for action to establish appropriate levels of exposure
to minimize risk.


Reasonable Evidence of Harm


Why is the European Environment Agency ready to act while Health
Canada and the US Food and Drug Administration are not?


The answer lies in the fact that Europe has a much stronger
public health tradition than Canada and especially the United States. Those who
reassure us that wireless technologies are safe say that a strong scientific
consensus must be reached before they take action. In contrast, the public
health approach taken by the European Environment Agency is to take action when
there’s reasonable evidence of harm.


If you have reasonable evidence of sharks in your swimming pool,
do you protect yourself? Or do you and your kids wait for scientific certainty
as you dive in?



Jeffry Fawcett has a PhD in environmental economics and
political economy. He is a writer and health educator, president of the
Sustainable Health Institute (sustainablehealthinstitute.org), and co-producer
of the Your Own Health and Fitness radio show.


Source:
alive #306, April
2008


This message is
intended for education purposes only. If you wish to be removed from this e-mail
list, please reply with "opt out" in subject. Thank you.


Una St.Clair-Moniz
Executive Director
Citizens for
Safe Technology Society

www.citizensforsafetechnology.org



Empowering the public to protect children

and youth from unsafe wireless
technologies.


A glimpse of Farmers' Market White Rock ; a day of recognition of Semiah...

Farmers' Market-White Rock; Semiahmoo Indian Band & First Nation Enterta...